A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Gulzar, Farzana
- Understanding the Necessity to Bridge the Digital Divide:An Evaluative Study
Authors
1 The Business School, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Kashmir, Jammu & Kashmir, IN
Source
International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices, Vol 6, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 1-4Abstract
The term ‘Digital Divide’ refers to the difference in the amount of information among individuals who have an access to the Internet and those who lack such access. This gap includes imbalances in terms of access to Internet infrastructure, information and knowledge, and equality of opportunity depending on income, race, ethnicity, gender, or other similar criteria. This paper explores the meaning of digital divide and connects it to Indian scenario. It talks about the causes of digital divide in the society like gender, physical access, age, income, and lack of information and communication technology (ICT) skills. It also analyses the causes and remedies of Digital Divide and further discusses the role of digital libraries in eradicating the digital divide. Finally, the paper suggests some steps that need to be taken by government in order to bridge the digital divide in the country.Keywords
Digital Divide, Digital Libraries, Gender Divide, ICTs, Role of Government.References
- Aqili, S. V., & Moghaddam, A. I. (2008). Bridging the digital divide: The role of librarians and information professionals in the third millennium. The Electronic Library, 26(2), 226-237.
- Behera, J. K. (2011). Problems and challenges of collection development of Indian libraries in digital era an assessment. Researchers World - Journal of Arts Science and Commerce, 139.
- Boje, C., & Dragulanescu, N. G. (2003). Digital divide in Eastern European countries and its social im-pact. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Ex-position. America.
- Chakraborty, J., & Bosman, M. M. (2005). Measuring the digital divide in the United States: Race, income, and personal computer ownership. The Professional Geographer, 57(3), 395-410.
- Fallows, D. (2005). How Women and Men Use the Internet Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2005/How-Women-and-Men-Use-the-Internet.aspx.
- Gobhinda, C. G. (n.d.). Digital Divide: How can digital libraries bridge the gap?
- Hilbert, M. (2011, November). Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34(6), 479-489.
- Kukshal, A., & Pant, D. (2013, July). Bridging digital divide: Challenges in Uttarakhand. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3(7), 1425-1428.
- Panda, M. I., Chhatar, M. C., & Bulu, D. M. (2013, December). A brief view to digital divide in Indian scenario. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(12).
- Singh, D. S. (2010). Digital divide in India: Measurement, determinants and policy for addressing the challenges in bridging the digital divide. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy, 1(2), 1-24.
- The Digital Divide, ICT and Broadband Internet. (2015, June 27). Retrieved from Internet World Stats: http://www.internetworldstats.com/links10.htm
- Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Boston: MIT Press.
- Study of Reengineering Practices in Tourism Industry
Authors
1 Department of Management Studies, University of Kashmir, Jammu & Kashmir, IN
Source
International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices, Vol 6, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 52-59Abstract
The dynamic market conditions characterized by increasing competitive pressures and customer requirements have always prompted organizations (particularly, learning organizations) to adopt innovative management approaches for survival and attain a competitive advantage. Of the various innovative approaches, one that promises extraordinary benefits is the concept of Business Process Reengineering (BPR) introduced by Hammer in the 1990s. BPR brings sweeping changes in the ways organizations operate and serve. It involves a radical shift, a shift from a task orientation/functional orientation to a process orientation. Process Reengineering is a disruptive/obliterative approach; it does away with the existing systems – the organizational, the people, and the technical, thereby, completely transforming an organization. Reengineering efforts are directed toward the objectives of speed, compression, flexibility, quality, innovation, and productivity. The application of this approach can lead to the development of “customer oriented effective organizations”. On account of the large and exceptional benefits that BPR promises, it has appealed to and attracted many takers from various industries. Reengineering efforts have been initiated and applied worldwide in various fields (manufacturing, retailing, services) in public and private sectors, multinational corporations, and small and medium enterprises (SMEs). The tourism industry is one with a huge potential and contributes enormously to the economy of a country. Given the growth prospects of this industry, it becomes interesting and imperative to understand how the industry has been keeping pace with changes and adapting innovative approaches. The present study, therefore, is an attempt to provide an account of application of BPR in the field of tourism. BPR has to be a synergistic and synchronized effort. A number of factors exercise their influence in making reengineering projects successful but the Information Technology (IT) plays a pivotal role. The researchers intend to identify all the factors that affect the success of reengineering effort in the tourism industry with a special emphasis on the IT.Keywords
Business Process Reengineering, Tourism, Process Orientation, Information Technology (IT).References
- Ahmad, H., Francis, A., & Zairi, M. (2007). Business process reengineering: Critical success factors in higher education. Business Process Management Journal, 13(3), 451-469. DOI:10.1108/14637150710752344
- Ahadi, H. R. (2004). An examination of the role of organizational enablers in business process reengineering and the impact of information technology. Information Resources Management Journal, 17(4), 1-19.
- Al-Mashari, M., & Zairi, M. (1999). BPR implementation process: An analysis of key success and failure factors. Business Process Management Journal, 5(1), 87-112.
- Al-Mashari, M., & Zairi, M. (2000). Revisiting BPR: A holistic review of practice and development. Business Process Management Journal, 6(1), 10-42.
- Al-Mashari, Irani, Z., & Zairi, M. (2001). Business process reengineering: A survey of international experience. Business Process Management Journal, 7(5), 437-455.
- Archer, R., & Bowker, P. (1995). BPR consulting an evaluation of the methods employed. Business Process Reengineering and Management Journal, 1(2), 39-41.
- Buhalis, D., Jafari, J., & Werthner, H. (1997). Information technology and the re-engineering of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(1), 245-248.
- Buhalis, D. (1997). Information technologies as a strategic tool for economic,cultural and environmental benefits enhancement of tourism at destination regions. Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3(1), 71-93.
- Buhalis, D. (1998). Strategic use of Information technologies in the tourism industry. Tourism Management, 19(5), 409-421. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00038-7
- Buhalis, D. (1994). Information and telecommunications technologies as a strategic tool for small and medium tourism enter-prises in the contemporary business environment. In: Seaton, A. et al. (eds) Tourism: The state of the art. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 254-275.
- Chan, K. K., & Spedding, T. A. (2003). An integrated multidimensional process improvement methodology for manufacturing systems. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 44(4), 673-693. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-8352(03)00002-0
- Cohen & Ewyk (1996). Business Process Re-engineering, HCI Consulting Notes, Sidney. Retreived from http//www.hci.com.au/management.
- Cooper, C., & Buhalis, D. (1992). Strategic management and marketing issues for SMTEs: A case study of the Greek Aegean Islands. In R. Teare, et al., Projects in hospitality organisations. London: Cassell.
- Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process innovation: Reengineering work through Information technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1995. tb01348.x
- Eric, M., & Stefanovic, M. (2008). Comparative characteristic of TQM and reengineering. In Quality festival 2008, International Quality Conference, Krafujevac, May 13-15, pp.15. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/317c/dcd22d8b1584e149910a275e2e23355d0fe4.pdf
- Guimaraes, T. (1997). Empirically testing the antecedents of BPR success. International Journal Production Economics, 50, 199-210.
- Habib, N. M., & Wazir, I. M. (2012). Role of education and training in the successful implementation of business process reengineering: A case of public sector of Khyber PakhtunKhwa (KPK). World Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 172-185.
- Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Re-engineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. London: Nicholas Brealey. DOI:10.1002/qre.4680100613
- Hesson, M., Al‐Ameed, H., & Samaka, M. (2007). Business process reengineering in UAE public sector: A town planning case study. Business Process Management Journal, 13(3), 348-378, DOI:10.1108/14637150710752281
- Lao, W., & Tung, Y. A. (1999). A framework for selecting business process modeling methods. Journal of Industrial Management & Data Systems, 99(7), 312-319.
- Mansar, L. S., & Reijers, H. A. (2005a). Best practices in business process redesign: An overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics. The International Journal of Management Science, 33(4), 283-306.
- Motwani, J., Kumar, A., Jiang, J., & Youssef, M. (1998). Business process reengineering: A theoretical framework and an integrated model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(9/10), 964-977.DOI:10.1108/EUM0000000004536
- O’Neill, P., & Sohal, S. A. (1999). Business process re-engineering: A review of recent literature. Technovation, 19(9), 571-581.
- Poon, A. (1994). Tourism, technology and competitive-strategies. Journal of Travel Research, 32(3). DOI:10.1177/004728759403200372
- Ranganathan, C., & Dhaliwal, J. (2001). A survey of business process reengneering practices in Singapore. Information and Management, 39(2), 125-134.
- Salimifard, K., Abbaszadeh, M. A., & Ghorbanpur, A. (2010). Interpretive structural modeling of critical success factors in banking process re-engineering. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(2), 95-103.
- Sheldon, P. (1994). Information technology and computer systems. In Tourism Marketing and Mnagement Handbook, 2nd edn, eds S.Witt and Moutinho Prentice Hall, London, 126-130.
- Sherwood-Smith, M. (1994). People Centred Process Reengineering: An Evaluation Perspective to Office System Re-design. In (Glasson et al., 1994), pp. 535-544
- Terziovski, M. E., Fitzpatrick, P., & O’Neill, P. (2003). Successful predictors of business process reengineering (BPR) in financial services. International Journal of Production Economics, 84(4), 23-32.
- Verboncu, I. (2013). Redesigning the organization’s management. Bucharest: PrintTech Publishing House.
- Vivienna, M., & Weeks, P. (1999) Re-Engineering MICE: An Organisational Model For Convention Services Management In 4-5 Star Hotels? 9th CAUTHE National Research Conference (Council for Australian University Tourism and Hospitality Education National Research Conference), Australia.
- Watts, J. (1995). An Introduction to Holistic BPR. Business Change & Re-engineering, 2(4), 3-6.
- Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y.K. (2011). Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 320-328. DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010
- An Insight into the Factors Affecting Women Technopreneurs
Authors
1 Research Scholar, Department of Management Studies, University of Kashmir, Jammu & Kashmir, IN
2 Senior Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, University of Kashmir, Jammu & Kashmir, IN
Source
International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices, Vol 8, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 33-40Abstract
Purpose: Participation of women in different types of entrepreneurship is on an all-time high with females actively embarking on these fields to pursue a career. Technology-based businesses have always been the domain of men essentially because of the field’s maledominated character. Despite of this fact, many women have ventured into this industry against all odds and made inroads in this field. However, the population of women entrepreneurs in technology sector is still marginal primarily because the climate for female technopreneurship in the country is not yet positive. The purpose of this paper is to investigate and examine into the various motivating and inhibiting factors that affect existing or potential women entrepreneurs in the technology field. The study will provide deeper insights to women considering starting a technopreneurial venture and has policy implications. Methodology: For the purpose of this study, insights were derived through an extensive review of theoretical and empirical papers on women entrepreneurship and women technopreneurship.
Objectives:
● To provide an account of women technopreneurship
● To identify and explain the various motivating and inhibiting factors that affect women technopreneurs